If anyone is tired of seeing Lt Col Jeffrey Krusinki’s
scratched-face mug shot then you shouldn’t start yawning yet. Read on. The Air
Force has some serious problems with how their members treat female airmen.
Krusinski is just the ugly inflamed tip of a deeper festering pustule within the
Air Force.
Lackland Air Force Base, near Sana Antonio, Texas, is where
all enlisted recruits go through eight weeks of recruit training or boot camp,
as it is also known. Each year the facility processes 30,000 to 40,000 recruits
for further training and assignment in the Air Force. Of those, about five
percent are women.
Allegations of sexual assault surfaced in June of 2011 that
first resulted in Staff Sgt. Luis Walker being convicted of the RAPE of one
female recruit and sexually assaulting several others. Walker was sentenced to 20
years in prison.
Since Walker’s conviction, many other members of the
Lackland staff and leadership have been convicted or are under investigation.
Charges are not limited to crimes of servicemen against servicewomen. Staff
Sgt. Emily Allen is facing charges in a court martial for having sex with a
male recruit.
As the temptation for a nudge and a grin goes around, with
regard to this case, one should keep in mind that Staff Sgt. Allen was the
empowered and trusted person of the two. Regardless of which gender is in the position
of power and, whether the act was consensual or forced, military leaders are
expected to maintain a professional relationship with all recruits. Fraternization
should not be tolerated.
What’s more, the recruit may not have actually been attracted
to the Staff Sgt. She could have been 10-15 years his senior and had physical
attributes that he found unappealing, it is conceivable that he did not feel
that he had a choice when she came on to him given that he was a recruit and
she was a staff member. Of course, this is only speculation. Whatever happened is for the court martial to sort out.
Investigation and allegations of the Lackland scandal are
still going on. However, now investigations are focusing more around what initial
reports were provided, if any, and if appropriate actions were taken based on
those reports.
The Air Force recently said that five commanders were
disciplined for either not being timely in reporting problems and incidents or
not taking proper action when given information of problems or incidents. The
names of these commanders have not been released as their discipline was not the
result of adjudication by court martial.
As the Uniform Code of Military Justice is presently
written, military commanders are empowered to overturn court martial
convictions with no other reason than that they believe that the defendant presented
an adequate defense and court was wrong. Legislation is pending in both the
House and the Senate to strip commanders of this empowerment.
There is a tendency, within the good ol’ boy network of
commanders to take favor over some service members convicted within their
command. This was the case in November of 2012 when Air Force Lt. Gen. Craig
Franklin overturned the conviction of Lt. Col. James Wilkerson for sexual assault
and other charges that he committed against a civilian Air Force employee. Wilkerson
was to be discharged from the Air Force and serve one year in jail.
Proponents of this process say that it is not a good ol’ boy
action but simply “the law” according to the UCMJ. If that is the case then why
did the Air Force go to the trouble of putting Wilkerson through a trial and
his victim through the trauma of testifying? Why not skip straight to the
commander for simply deciding that the defendant is not guilty? That was the ultimate
result.
To further salt the wound for the victim, she was not
notified of this decision but, rather, heard of it as everyone else did. That
still wasn't enough “not guilty” for Lt. Gen. Wilkerson. He was also added to
the promotion list.
Eventually, the public outcry was loud enough that Wilkerson
quietly retired from the Air Force. We shouldn't forget that his original conviction
stripped him of that retirement by mandating his separation from the Air Force. The commander reinstated it by overturning the
conviction.
There are women in the good ol’ boy network, too. The
network is strong and well-rooted in the military. Regardless of gender, if one
is going to rise in the ranks, then he or she must learn and follow the
unwritten rules to survive. For women, it would seem, the fear of losing favor
within the network is amplified by a naturally smaller set of resources within
the network.
Lt. Gen. Susan Helm overturned a conviction for sexual
assault on an Air Force captain in February of last year. That action is being
scrutinized by the Senate and may prevent the former astronaut from being
promoted to vice commander of the Air Force’s Space Command. Lt. Gen. Helm
holds the honor of being the first U.S. military woman to travel into space.
Last weekend Lt. Col. Jeffrey Krusinski became the poster
boy for Air Force ineptitude with handling RAPE and sexual crimes. As the head
of the Air Force Sexual Assault Prevention and Response program, he was the
absolute last person in the Air Force that should be charged with sexual
crimes. Nonetheless, his unhappy face is posted everywhere in the media this
week with stories of allegations against him for groping a woman in a parking
lot while he was in a state of drunkenness.
Sexual Assault Prevention and Response or SAPR, as it is
also known, was established in 2004 by the direction of, then Secretary of
Defense, Donald Rumsfield. The purpose was to establish a consistent plan to
stop sexual crimes in all of the military services with a solid top down
leadership and accountability. Sadly, the leadership part didn't work out so
well for the Air Force.
On the positive side, if Krusinski is convicted, it will be
in a civilian court. His commander will be unable to overturn his conviction
and give him a clean slate. In addition, any jail time given for the conviction
will prevent him from reporting for duty to the Air Force. That could result in
his, less than honorable, discharge from the Air Force and thwart any
possibility of “quietly” retiring.
No comments:
Post a Comment